JM: Tell us about the pre-sentencing process: Reggie: The Presentencing process was Basically I didn't
have bond money so I stayed in jail until my
court date. Some times the court was so full that
thay revised the court date or the lawyer didn't
show up so the date would be revised. Sarah: I don't know what pre-sentencing is. There was
a hearing, and at the end, the judge found me
guilty of civil contempt of a court order, and
floundered around about the sentence with
opposing counsel, not seeming to know what to
order, then concocked something.
JM: Did you have police stop by your house for questioning? If not please give us details on how you came to be arrested. Reggie: They charged me with B& E and assault with a
deadly weapon. Which I did jump through a window
because the person I was argueing with locked me
out however I didn't have a weapon. Sarah: No. I was never arrested. I was just put in
jail straight from the hearing.
JM: What as court like? Please give as many details as you recall. Reggie: Court was basically I didn't want to sit in jail
anymore so I took a plea deal. Sarah: The court hearing was merely a formality on a
Show Cause Order for civil contempt. These are
not heard by a jury. The case was not placed on
the calendar. The hearing was held "out of
sight" in a separate courtroom during Monday's
calendar 10 am call. Opposing counsel spoke
first, lying repeatedly, then my attorney and I
both spoke, then opposing counsel again. We
never had a chance to hear or cross-examine any
sworn testimony against me. The judge admitted
near the end that he had no choice based on a
prior COA Opinion. His decision was prejudged.
The judge knew and allowed opposing counsel to
lie, and in fact covered for him when my
attorney pointed it out. The judge said it
didn't matter.
JM: What were your original charges? What did you end up being convicted of? Reggie: B&e and assault with a deaqdly weapon with intent
to kill Sarah: On motion of opposing counsel in my 2006 civil
libel suit against the News & Observer, I was
ordered by Judge Donald W. Stephens to appear
before Judge Wm. Pittman on 11/2/2009 to show
cause why I should not be held in civil contempt
for "apparent" violation of a pre-filing
injunction ordered in 2001 in an unrelated
matter, for filing opposition to a $98,260.40
default judgment for attorney fees. Bennett v.
N&O, 06-CVS-14229. The 2001 order prohibited me
from filing anything without a lawyer in my
father's personal injury lawsuit, a case I was
ordered to file on his behalf in 2000. Judge
Wm. Pittman convicted of me willful "civil
contempt" of the 2001 order, purporting that I
had filed a motion for relief from the default
judgment without a lawyer.